Archive for April, 2011

Donald Trump

Saturday, April 30th, 2011

Don’t be fooled, Donald Trump is a stalking horse.

I’m reasonably sure that in his ego-maniacal mind he’s a real candidate, but then so was Ralph Nader.  The difference is that the Republican party and its propaganda wing and the are treating Trump like he’s a serious candidate.  The reason they’re doing that is because he’s their stalking horse.  He’s there to make the other crazies look sane by comparison.  Next to Trump, Sarah Palin, Ron Paul, or Mike Huckabee look like frickin Adalai Stevenson.

About halfway through the primaries, once they’re ready to anoint a front-runner, you’ll stop hearing anything about Donald Trump whether he pulls out of the race or not.  If he’s gotten any traction in the early primaries, look for a more extreme candidate from the Republicans.  If he falls flat, look for someone who appears to be more mainstream.  His results will help them gauge the mood of their base, and his wackiness will legitimize the other wackos.  That’s how The Donald fits into their plans.

Digplanet

Friday, April 29th, 2011

You might have noticed that I’ve been using a lot of links to Digplanet in my blog posts.  There’s a reason for that – I’m the main guy behind the creation of Digplanet, and it’s at a stage where I’m pretty happy with letting the world see it.  Check it out, browse around, search, and try the tabs.  Oh, and you can jump into Digparty from there too.

Royal Wedding

Friday, April 29th, 2011

I’m sorry, but I can’t look at the hubbub over the royal wedding without thinking about the injustice of the wealth and privilege behind it.  Yes, I’m sure that personally they’re both very nice people, probably, how would I know really, but UK taxpayers are spending something like $30,000,000 on their wedding at the same time that they’re laying off thousands of middle class employees.  Why?  These are already both extremely wealthy people – he’s the Duke of Frickin’ Cambridge for crissakes – don’t you think that they could pay for their own damn wedding?  What’s wrong with these people?  Maybe take the fabulousness down a notch if times are tight.  I mean, the UK taxpayers already float these people about $42,000,000 a year, not counting the security they also provide.  Or how about this – a nice simple ceremony and donate the money to charity?  You know, there are actually some people in the UK suggesting that maybe they could replace the monarchy with a democratically elected head of state – what a barbarous idea!  Clearly it could never work.

Are Corporations and Unions Equivalent?

Thursday, April 28th, 2011

In discussions about money and politics in America, corporations and unions are often mentioned in the same breath.  Many people seem to feel that corporations are largely conservative or Republican supporters, and unions are assumed to be liberal or Democratic supporters.  So the reason for mentioning them in the same breath is to suggest that each party’s supporters should be treated the same when it comes to granting or denying the right to participate in elections.  Republicans get corporate support, Democrats get union support, and everything is fair.  Right?

For the moment, let’s ignore the question of whether corporations really do support conservatives and/or Republicans, and vice versa for unions.  That’s a whole discussion by itself.  Instead, let’s look at the two players here, corporations and unions, from the perspective of Democracy.  Who are they?  Should they be allowed to participate in elections in a Democracy?

Corporations are businesses that are owned by both businesses and people who buy shares.  The money that they pay for their shares goes to help finance the business.  Their only goal is profit for the shareholders.  Shareholders are not personally liable for the debts of the corporation, which has led to corporations being treated under the law as “individuals” who pay their own taxes.  Recently, corporations have also been granted the right of unlimited financial participation in US elections, although they have not yet been granted the right to vote (see Citizens United v US).

One key point here is that shareholders can be US citizens, or they can be foreign citizens, foreign businesses, or even foreign governments, and in practice the percentage of US corporations that include foreign shareholders is very high.

So when we granted corporations the right of unlimited financial participation in US elections, we were also granting foreign citizens, foreign businesses, or even foreign governments unlimited financial participation in US elections.  Interesting idea.

What about unions?  Unions are groups of people who form their union in order to work together for their own benefit.  There are employee unions, consumer unions, sports unions, taxpayer unions, student unions, and even credit unions.  Unions are run democratically, voting for officers and major decisions.  Union members are all human beings, and nearly all members of US unions are US citizens.  Unions were also granted the right of unlimited financial participation in US elections, but in some sense since their members are citizens they already had that right.

The word Democracy means the rule of the people, and the US Constitution begins “We The People” for a reason.  Financial participation in elections is a substantial and important part of the democratic process.  Are groups of owners seeking profit, including foreigners (corporations), really equivalent to groups of citizens seeking mutual benefit (unions)?

Sterling Archer – Spy, Bon Vivant, Ego Maniac

Wednesday, April 27th, 2011

Sterling Archer is my kind of guy, in a theoretical sense.  In real world he’d probably be a real pain in the ass, but in the world of ISIS he’s brilliant.  There’s no real doubt that he’s going to be obnoxious, he’s Sterling Fricking Archer for crissakes.  There’s also no real doubt that he’s up for anything, as long as it’s sophisticated, solipsistic, and probably foolhardy.

BTW, Cheryl/Carol Tunt is really hot.  There’s just something about that girl, probably her voice.